Chapter-2 A Concrete Example — Online MCQ Test
ENGLISH · Grade 8 · CBSE(NCERT)
Practice Chapter-2 A Concrete Example with a free chapter-wise online MCQ test.
This chapter covers: logic - analytical thinking - practicality - evidence - deductive reasoning - concrete proof.
AI-generated questions from basic to board-exam level, with instant results and explanations.
Chapter-2 A Concrete Example — Important Questions & Answers
What is the main purpose of using concrete examples in analytical writing?
- A. To make abstract ideas more understandable and relatable
- B. To increase the word count of the essay
- C. To replace logical arguments entirely
- D. To confuse the reader with too much detail
Answer: A. To make abstract ideas more understandable and relatable
Concrete examples serve to illustrate abstract concepts, making them easier for readers to understand and relate to.
Concrete examples serve to illustrate abstract concepts, making them easier for readers to understand and relate to.
In deductive reasoning, what is the first step?
- A. Draw a conclusion
- B. State a general principle or major premise
- C. Find supporting evidence
- D. Question the hypothesis
Answer: B. State a general principle or major premise
Deductive reasoning begins with a general principle or major premise, from which specific conclusions are drawn.
Deductive reasoning begins with a general principle or major premise, from which specific conclusions are drawn.
Which of the following is an example of concrete evidence?
- A. A personal opinion about something
- B. A historical fact supported by documents and dates
- C. A general feeling or intuition
- D. An assumption without verification
Answer: B. A historical fact supported by documents and dates
Concrete evidence is factual, verifiable, and supported by tangible proof such as documents, dates, or measurable data.
Concrete evidence is factual, verifiable, and supported by tangible proof such as documents, dates, or measurable data.
What does 'analytical thinking' primarily involve?
- A. Accepting information without questioning
- B. Breaking down information into parts and examining relationships
- C. Making quick judgments based on feelings
- D. Avoiding detailed examination of facts
Answer: B. Breaking down information into parts and examining relationships
Analytical thinking involves breaking down complex information into components and examining how they relate to each other.
Analytical thinking involves breaking down complex information into components and examining how they relate to each other.
How does analytical thinking help in understanding a concrete example?
- A. It prevents deeper understanding of the example
- B. It allows us to break down the example and understand its components and significance
- C. It has no connection to concrete examples
- D. It encourages accepting information without question
Answer: B. It allows us to break down the example and understand its components and significance
Analytical thinking enables us to examine and understand the components and relationships within a concrete example.
Analytical thinking enables us to examine and understand the components and relationships within a concrete example.
If a writer wants to convince readers about climate change, which approach would be most effective according to 'A Concrete Example'?
- A. Make general statements without any proof
- B. Provide concrete examples like temperature data, melting glaciers, and weather patterns
- C. Ask readers to believe without evidence
- D. Use only theoretical concepts
Answer: B. Provide concrete examples like temperature data, melting glaciers, and weather patterns
Using concrete, verifiable examples with actual data strengthens the argument and makes it more convincing.
Using concrete, verifiable examples with actual data strengthens the argument and makes it more convincing.
What is the logical flaw in this statement: 'All dogs are animals, therefore all animals are dogs'?
- A. It follows correct deductive reasoning
- B. It reverses the logical relationship incorrectly
- C. It provides concrete examples
- D. It is perfectly logical
Answer: B. It reverses the logical relationship incorrectly
This reverses the major premise incorrectly; while all dogs are animals, it does not follow that all animals are dogs.
This reverses the major premise incorrectly; while all dogs are animals, it does not follow that all animals are dogs.
How would you distinguish between a concrete example and abstract reasoning in an academic argument?
- A. Concrete examples are never used in academics
- B. Concrete examples are specific instances while abstract reasoning deals with general concepts; both work together to strengthen arguments
- C. Abstract reasoning is always more valuable than concrete examples
- D. They serve no purpose in academic writing
Answer: B. Concrete examples are specific instances while abstract reasoning deals with general concepts; both work together to strengthen arguments
Concrete examples provide specific, verifiable cases that illustrate abstract principles, and together they create stronger, more convincing arguments.
Concrete examples provide specific, verifiable cases that illustrate abstract principles, and together they create stronger, more convincing arguments.
Which of the following BEST demonstrates the integration of analytical thinking, deductive reasoning, and concrete evidence?
- A. A student believes a theory without testing it
- B. A scientist observes a phenomenon, applies general principles of physics, conducts experiments to gather data, and draws conclusions from measurable results
- C. A writer makes claims based only on personal feelings
- D. An investor makes decisions purely on hunches
Answer: B. A scientist observes a phenomenon, applies general principles of physics, conducts experiments to gather data, and draws conclusions from measurable results
The scientist's approach combines observation (analytical thinking), application of general principles (deductive reasoning), and measurable data (concrete evidence).
The scientist's approach combines observation (analytical thinking), application of general principles (deductive reasoning), and measurable data (concrete evidence).
If a historical claim states 'The Industrial Revolution caused immediate widespread prosperity,' what concrete evidence would be needed to verify or refute this claim?
- A. Personal opinions of historians
- B. Statistical data on wages, living conditions, and employment patterns before, during, and after the Industrial Revolution, along with documented accounts
- C. General assumptions about progress
- D. Beliefs about what should have happened
Answer: B. Statistical data on wages, living conditions, and employment patterns before, during, and after the Industrial Revolution, along with documented accounts
Verifying or refuting historical claims requires concrete evidence such as statistical data, documented records, and measurable changes in living standards over time.
Verifying or refuting historical claims requires concrete evidence such as statistical data, documented records, and measurable changes in living standards over time.